- Politics, Culture and Society
- Archive
- Vol. 1, No. 1
- Shadows of Peace: Hegemony, Violence, and the Unfinished Plural Public Sphere in Post-War Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis of Easter Sunday Attacks in Sri Lanka
Shadows of Peace: Hegemony, Violence, and the Unfinished Plural Public Sphere in Post-War Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis of Easter Sunday Attacks in Sri Lanka
Published in January - June 2026 (Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2026)

Keywords
Abstract
Authors (2)
Sachini Geethanjalee
University of Peradeniya, Sri ...University of Peradeniya, Sri LankaUniversity of Peradeniya, Sri LankaUniversity of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
View all publications →Nethmi Sakalasooriya
University of Peradeniya, Sri ...University of Peradeniya, Sri LankaUniversity of Peradeniya, Sri LankaUniversity of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
View all publications →Full Text Access Required
This article requires purchase or a subscription to access the full text. The abstract is freely available above.
Article Information
Published in:
January - June 2026 (Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2026)- Article ID:
- PCS110006
- Paper ID:
- PCS-01-000006
- Pages:
- 21-46
- Published Date:
- 2026-01-26
- JATS XML:
- JATS XML
How to Cite
Geethanjalee, S., & Sakalasooriya, N. (2026). Shadows of Peace: Hegemony, Violence, and the Unfinished Plural Public Sphere in Post-War Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis of Easter Sunday Attacks in Sri Lanka. Politics, Culture and Society, 1(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.68243/jpcs.2026.v1.i1.000006
Article Actions
Article Impact
Smart Citations
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
More from this Issue
Editorial’s Introduction Imagining Public Plural Spaces
This issue of the Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, titled Imagining Plural Public Spheres, examines pluralism as an ongoing political, institutional, and democratic practice rather than merely a demographic condition of coexistence. It explores how public spaces are continuously constructed, negotiated, and contested amid unequal power relations, technological transformation, political fragmentation, and social change. Drawing on legal, cultural, political, economic, and historical perspectives, the contributions investigate diverse dimensions of plural public life, including legal pluralism, digital markets, community identities, caste, religious pluralism, new media, print culture, gender, and the normalization of violence. The issue highlights how institutions, technologies, markets, narratives, and social practices can both facilitate participation and reproduce exclusion, hierarchy, and domination. By bringing together empirical, theoretical, and historical approaches, the contributions question conventional distinctions between public and private spheres and examine the processes through which individuals and communities gain visibility, recognition, and political significance. The issue ultimately conceptualizes the plural public sphere as a dynamic and contested domain that requires continuous democratic negotiation of difference, belonging, participation, and power.
Beyond the Majoritarian Horizon: Examining the Indian Narrative of Minority Rights and Liberal Public Sphere
The paper examines the structure of the public sphere in India with a special focus on the minority rights discourse. To help reimagine this concept, it draws upon the theoretical interventions made by Jürgen Habermas, namely communicative action, Will Kymlicka’s liberal defense of group-differentiated rights, Iris Marion Young’s transformative politics of difference and Bhikhu Parekh’s dialogical model of multiculturalism. It maps the complex constitutional landscape around minority rights and the deep-seated tensions among the stakeholders responsible for a pluralistic public sphere, seeking to understand the anatomy of minority rights in India and its connection with building a liberal public sphere. Four areas- normative, institutional, pedagogical, and technological- demand a reset to make the public sphere more receptive. On the normative side, a dominant didactic framework directly bears on the public sphere; institutionally, the paper highlights the need for accommodative templates to facilitate the minority communities’ engagement with the state. Pedagogical intervention is critical, since the lack of a critical discourse reproduces social exclusion and defeats a genuine public sphere. The paper also discusses the unprecedented digital expansion in India and the degree of its alignment with the effort of creating a liberal public sphere.
Plural Market Publics: Digital Platforms and Women’s Economic Participation in Jaipur’s Handicraft Sector
In India’s handicraft sector, women have long been central to production yet excluded from visible market spaces and denied public authority within them. This paper asks what happens when selling moves online in the context of gendered spheres of craft production and entrepreneurship. Drawing on interviews with ten women entrepreneurs in Jaipur and observation of bazaars and digital selling practices, it examines how digital platforms enable middle-class women to enter new markets, build customer relationships, and establish legitimacy in ways the physical bazaar rarely allowed. The study finds not one market but several coexisting market publics: bazaars, exhibitions, and platform-based communities, each with its own rules of participation and recognition. This plurality is theorized as a plural public sphere. Women’s digital selling constitutes alternative market publics: arenas built through circulation, conversation and trust rather than shopfronts, and organized around values of craft, care and community as much as profit. Platforms do more than widen access: they alter the structure of participation. They reduce reliance on male intermediaries, create direct channels to customers, and allow women to appear, on their own terms, as market actors. Yet these opportunities remain uneven, reaching a resourceful section of the middle class: visibility must be maintained, authenticity performed, and unpredictable algorithms, platform dependence and rising labor demands managed. Digital platforms, the paper concludes, do not dissolve gendered market hierarchies but reorganize them, opening real yet conditional ground on which women negotiate recognition as legitimate economic actors. The paper thus contributes to discussions of gender, digital platforms, and economic inclusion.
More by These Authors
State law, dispute processing, and legal pluralism: unspoken dialogues from rural India by Kalindi Kokal, London: Routledge, 2020, 218 pp., ISBN 9781138625211
2026 • Vol. 1, Issue 1
Read more →

Closed Access