Skip to main content
Published
Closed AccessClosed Access
Login to Access

Beyond Borders, Across Faiths: The Digitization of Muley Jat Identity

Published in January - June 2026 (Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2026)

Beyond Borders, Across Faiths: The Digitization of Muley Jat Identity - Issue cover

Abstract

Digital platforms have shaped the ways in which caste identities are defined across geographical and religious differences. This paper deals with the identity formation of the Muley (Muslim) Jats, a community that resides in western Uttar Pradesh and how digital spaces allow the formation of a collective caste consciousness for the Hindu and Muslim Jats found across India and abroad. The research is built on six months of digital ethnography watching across three connected spaces: the community site Jatland.com, Instagram pages, and YouTube channels dedicated to Jat history and community life. Over this period, posts, videos, captions, comment sections and images were collected through field notes, screenshots, and worked through thematic analysis. Theoretically, this study is based on the ideas of how a community imagines itself in digital spaces, adopted from Benedict Anderson’s imagined communities, and how a community sees itself as connected through roots, adopted from C.H. Cooley’s looking glass self and how a community present itself on digital spaces through presentation, like glorifying their caste on digital spaces, adopted from Ervin Goffman’s presentation of self. What is shown by the material is that belonging is created around shared ancestry, gotra ties, and common narrative. But this sense of unity is not stable. It comes apart when the topic is elections, honor, or communal violence. These platforms reveal gender imbalance, and the leadership is mainly male, while women’s experiences and voices stay largely at the margins. The article argues that placing caste online is not a one-time transfer of something into a new space. It is an ongoing process by which identity is being made and remade, not just displayed.

Authors (1)

Choudhary Shahrukh
ORCID

Centre for Studies of Plural S...

View all publications →

Full Text Access Required

This article requires purchase or a subscription to access the full text. The abstract is freely available above.

Article Price: ₹100

Article Information

Article ID:
PCS110008
Paper ID:
PCS-01-000008
Pages:
71-101
Published Date:
2026-03-01
JATS XML:
JATS XML

How to Cite

Shahrukh, C. (2026). Beyond Borders, Across Faiths: The Digitization of Muley Jat Identity. Politics, Culture and Society, 1(1), 71-101. https://doi.org/10.68243/jpcs.2026.v1.i1.000008

Article Actions

Purchase Article

Article Impact

Views:96
Downloads:0
scite_
PlumX Metrics Badge
96
Article Views
0
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Social Shares

More from this Issue

Editorial’s Introduction Imagining Public Plural Spaces

This issue of the Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, titled Imagining Plural Public Spheres, examines pluralism as an ongoing political, institutional, and democratic practice rather than merely a demographic condition of coexistence. It explores how public spaces are continuously constructed, negotiated, and contested amid unequal power relations, technological transformation, political fragmentation, and social change. Drawing on legal, cultural, political, economic, and historical perspectives, the contributions investigate diverse dimensions of plural public life, including legal pluralism, digital markets, community identities, caste, religious pluralism, new media, print culture, gender, and the normalization of violence. The issue highlights how institutions, technologies, markets, narratives, and social practices can both facilitate participation and reproduce exclusion, hierarchy, and domination. By bringing together empirical, theoretical, and historical approaches, the contributions question conventional distinctions between public and private spheres and examine the processes through which individuals and communities gain visibility, recognition, and political significance. The issue ultimately conceptualizes the plural public sphere as a dynamic and contested domain that requires continuous democratic negotiation of difference, belonging, participation, and power.

Azeema SaleemRead more →

Beyond the Majoritarian Horizon: Examining the Indian Narrative of Minority Rights and Liberal Public Sphere

The paper examines the structure of the public sphere in India with a special focus on the minority rights discourse. To help reimagine this concept, it draws upon the theoretical interventions made by Jürgen Habermas, namely communicative action, Will Kymlicka’s liberal defense of group-differentiated rights, Iris Marion Young’s transformative politics of difference and Bhikhu Parekh’s dialogical model of multiculturalism. It maps the complex constitutional landscape around minority rights and the deep-seated tensions among the stakeholders responsible for a pluralistic public sphere, seeking to understand the anatomy of minority rights in India and its connection with building a liberal public sphere. Four areas- normative, institutional, pedagogical, and technological- demand a reset to make the public sphere more receptive. On the normative side, a dominant didactic framework directly bears on the public sphere; institutionally, the paper highlights the need for accommodative templates to facilitate the minority communities’ engagement with the state. Pedagogical intervention is critical, since the lack of a critical discourse reproduces social exclusion and defeats a genuine public sphere. The paper also discusses the unprecedented digital expansion in India and the degree of its alignment with the effort of creating a liberal public sphere.

Sumit HowladarRead more →

Shadows of Peace: Hegemony, Violence, and the Unfinished Plural Public Sphere in Post-War Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis of Easter Sunday Attacks in Sri Lanka

Sri Lankan Post-war public sphere was constructed with the aspiration of plural coexistence. Nevertheless, within a decade of the civil war’s end in 2009, coordinated suicide bombings on Easter Sunday in 2019 targeting Catholic churches and luxury hotels shattered that aspiration and exposed structural failures beneath it. This study investigates why ethno-religious intra-state conflict persists in post-war Sri Lanka despite sustained peacebuilding efforts, taking the Easter Sunday attacks as its analytical fulcrum. Using qualitative fieldwork at Katuwapitiya in Western Province, including in-depth interviews, discussions, observations, newspapers and academic articles, this study argues that the attacks cannot be understood outside the longer history of Sinhala-Buddhist hegemony structuring Sri Lankan statecraft since independence. Based on Gramsci’s hegemony, Ted Gurr’s relative deprivation theory and Gellner’s nationalism framework, the research demonstrates that the Easter Sunday bombings functioned simultaneously as a social declaration, a political instrument and an expression of unresolved ethno-religious tensions that post-war administrations failed to address. The findings highlight that political actors instrumentalized the attacks to consolidate majoritarian power, that extremist social movements depended on communal divisions, and that justice for victims remains systematically deferred. The research also reveals that although relations between Catholic and Muslim communities were seriously challenged by the attacks, grassroots solidarity and cooperation between neighbors remained resilient. This demonstrates a form of everyday pluralism that challenges narratives of permanent communal conflict often promoted by political actors.

Sachini Geethanjalee, Net...Read more →